Multi-Platform?

Unity does support mobile. Once the game is complete up to the point of a release I was planning on doing a few exports to test what it would be like on mobile.

well then llama i think i just fell in love with you for thinking of my little kindle fire by the way where will you be putting it up to play will it have its own website which would be awesome!!!

I would like to get as much coverage as possible. We will probably start on our own site with both web player and download. Shortly after moving out to sites like kong while trying stuff like steam greenlight.

Will the mobile version be free? most of games of web in mobile need to pay money

As of now ill say ad free. But that is only because I'm expecting it to be supported by micro purchases.

lol FO could be accessed by kindle fire. I remember it seemed like passent only used kindle fire to play.

I used to access fo on my phone using dolphin browser.

Please implement advertisements as a small revenue generator. This will ensure financial support parallelling microtransactions , allow for purchases and provide an economic safety net in the case of unfortunate events. Advertisements are generally unnoticed anyways. 

Yeah I agree with you, mvp. I personally don't mind ads as long as they're not too distracting. Like a small ad here and there would be fine with me, and it would provide some money to the game. If people dislike ads then you could always implement and option to pay a price to play ad-free. I'd say ads are pretty reasonable especially in the games early stages.

They also have a number of issues though, aside from not being guaranteed to bring in any sort of acceptable income, there are frequently questionable advertisements that crop up on them.

Even if you get told it can't happen by the provider, it will.

It's something we would have to look into in far more detail, nothing is ever as easy as it seems (I wish it was)

Thing is is this, IMO, micro transactions can be good if you only have to do em once, ie £2.00 if everyone who played paid that is easy money to pay, and would yield a lot. Maybe £2.00 a month even?? But when it starts with 50 pence for this then 50 pence for that, that will soon add up to a lot more than £2.00 per person, even than per month. I think you are far more likely to get more players doing £2.00 a month than the 50p way of doing things. Any game that uses micro transactions just to continue, or get something done, or get ahead in the game I don't play. That's why I enjoyed FO so much even though I did pump some money in.

Being forced to pay to play monthly doesn't sound like a very good idea imo. That would probably turn off a lot of people from the game, in fact it would probably do the exact opposite of what you said, "I think you are far more likely to get more players doing £2.00 a month than the 50p way of doing things." FO's system was more pay to get ahead, and it worked well. That way you could play just as anyone else would and, if you needed a boost, you can choose to pay a little money for an exp or money boost or whatever. A monthly fee to play sounds a bit drastic to me.
Keep it completely free to play with the option to pay just as FO did.

A few games have monthly subscriptions, so it's not impossible and it's on the list for discussion.
Chances are the main source will be micro-transactions though yes, we've mentioned it a bit in some other threads, but we do want to avoid it being a pay to win, so we'll be exploring what sort of things should be bought with premium currency, and ways for people to gain it for free by playing (granted it taking longer than if you bought it with real money).